- G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
- OPENING: 08/07/2009
- STUDIO: Paramount
- ACCOMPLICES:
Trailer, Official Site - SOUNDTRACK:
The Charge
When all else fails, they don’t.
Opening Statement
Pre-release buzz hasn’t been kind to G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. Even hardcore fans lambasted the film as a failure, with only the preview to support their theory. Rumors started to circulate that director Sommers was replaced in the editing room and screen tests had resulted in G.I. Joe becoming the lowest scoring movie in Paramount history. The filmmakers and the studio both denied these allegations, though this didn’t deter the fanboys from continuing to deride the property as a surefire flop and probable artistic whitewash.
One look at the film, however, and you should be able to deduce that it’s the haters and not the makers who are lying. It may not be a masterpiece but boy is the new G.I. Joe a whole heap of fun. There is no way this well-executed actioner is the worst testing movie in Paramount history. It’s far from cerebral, but there is simply too much to enjoy for any semblance of hate to creep inside a viewers mind. The film falls flat in a few areas, typical for a blockbuster (story, dialogue), but the action is fantastic and the performances are a hoot and a half.
Facts of the Case
The film picks up as U.S. soldiers Duke (Channing Tatum, Step-Up), Ripcord (Marlon Wayans, Scary Movie), and their platoon are ambushed, as they attempt to move a set of devastatingly powerful missiles across the country. The thief happens to be an old squeeze of Duke’s who now goes by the name "The Baroness" (Sienna Miller, Stardust). She steals the weapons but, thanks to intervention of a secret unit called G.I. Joe, the men escape with their lives. G.I. Joe immediately take Duke and Ripcord back to base where the pair join up under the watchful eye of General Hawk (Dennis Quaid, Flight of the Phoenix). After completing a series of initiation trials, Ripcord and Duke prepare to help the squad find out if the mastermind behind the theft is a sinister weapons dealer (Christopher Eccleston, Doctor Who) or is something bigger behind the Baroness’ violent actions.
The Evidence
If you’re the sort of filmgoer who has no trouble tapping into your inner 15 year old, then go see G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. It’s that simple. The film packs everything into its two hour runtime that one loves about blockbusters: great action, cool characters, cheesy comedy, a dash of romance, and plenty of sex appeal. Stephen Sommers carries with him a love/hate stigma amongst film fans — you either find his brand of high octane action awesome or grating. I have always maintained a soft spot for the man. The Mummy and Van Helsing are unfairly maligned and his forgotten monster movie Deep Rising is pleasantly entertaining. G.I. Joe stays true to past form, so your feelings concerning his directorial ability will probably once again come to play. If you’ve detested past efforts, I doubt this picture will change your mind. However, if you’re prepared to forgive a thin plot and a few other faults, you’ll receive a straight up dose of fun.
The performances throughout are affable and never taken too seriously, the filmmakers having assembled an odd collection of thespians to bring this world to life. Channing Tatum takes his leading man duties and executes them solidly, displaying a knack for action, drama, and a little comic relief, whilst showcasing a natural and likable charisma. For the ladies, he also provides an obvious blast of sex appeal, though on that front the film’s biggest star is a leather clad Sienna Miller. The British actress prances around in interchangeably sexy outfits, while totting guns and villainous smirks like they’re going out of fashion. Miller has done some good work in the past, but has been slow to embrace Hollywood. G.I. Joe proves she’s as game as anyone for kickass action and blockbuster credentials. The rest of the cast is sound. Old stalwarts Dennis Quaid and Jonathan Pryce do good work in smaller roles, while a younger generation of actors such as Rachel Nicols and Marlon Wayans carry out their efforts remarkably well. Until the final 20 minutes, the film lacks a clear bad guy — Eccleston’s arms dealer is adequate, but never terrifically imposing — though further sequels should sort out this problem by default.
The story is pretty linear and underwhelming, but the writers have at least written a batch of characters more intriguing than the average blockbuster inhabitants, with several of the personalities having been gifted surprisingly dense and effective back-stories. These little flashbacks play second fiddle to the explosive action and athletic sword fights, but one has to admire the writing team for adding a little extra meat to their characters’ bones. The dialogue certainly clunks around in places, but hey, even the original Star Wars movies had the odd ear-splittingly awful one-liner.
The action sequences are exhilarating and the use of CGI is sharp and effective, Sommers having perfected the ratio of banging thrills to plot dramatics present in good summer movies. The finale is an unstoppable rush of FX-driven adrenaline, but even in its smaller moments of carnage and gun blasting this is a movie that knows how to keep audiences on the edge of their seats. Never do the set pieces grow stale or repetitive like Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. This is action at its most sublime; a missile-induced pursuit through the streets of Paris is quite possibly the best action sequence of 2009 thus far. The neat CGI is definitely a bonus. Sommers’ lively and energetic direction gifts these moments with excitement and enticing scale, marking them as the best sort of set-pieces the genre offers.
Closing Statement
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra is a total blast from start to finish, the sort of blockbuster where the story is padding for celebratory action and keen performances. Not being a fan of the enterprise, I can’t say if this is the movie G.I. Joe devotees have waited so long for nor if their hatred is deserved and rightfully placed. However, for those in search of seasonal thrills and monstrously entertaining filmmaking, I suggest you give it a chance. This is a better action movie than I or anyone else was seemingly expecting. Fans of delightful popcorn cinema would be unwise to miss it.
The Verdict
7/10
5 comments ↓
Excellent review, and I must agree it was a very fun film, especially the car chase scene midway through. Also so much better than the horrid Transformers 2.
I wasn’t expecting much from this movie, too, based on reviews I’ve read and was pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoyed it. My favorite popcorn flick of the summer! Mindnumbing action and spectacular effects! I love the backstories, too, as I’m not familiar with the characters. Looking forward to the sequel! (*** out of ****)
Sorry but I found this appalingly dull and cliche. Plus, the Joes are the worst special unit I’ve ever seen! They’re arrogant, un-professional, they manage to wreck half of Paris trying to save it, fail and end up being captured by the French police!
The fight scenes are boring and overlong, the plot is a mess (a bomb containing remote controlled bugs?!), the dialogue is laughable drivel, the CGI looks like it was ported from the Playstation 2, the charcaters are paper thin morons, it’s way too long for a popcorn flick, the big twist I saw coming a mile off.
Oh and Christopher Eccleston’s Scottish accent? Just awful.
Wost of all a sequel has clearly been set up in the final scene – have mercy.
This is essentially live action Team America but without jokes or a hint of irony.
I think GI Joe does exactly what it says on the tin – it entertains. I saw it with my kids (11 and 12) and we had a great time.
It was never going to be Shakespeare and yes it has a couple of low points – sorry Christopher but the accent is a bit wobbly – and really why bother with it. An English villain would have been fine.
The action was fast and furious with some original moments. People talk about the action in Paris but I thought the attack on the GI base was perhaps superior.
As an action / popcorn film it works just fine and my kids and I had a blast. Can’t say fairer than that from a movie!
Well, Daniel, after rereading this review, I am reminded of a few lines from different things I saw as a lad. Lines like “You no longer have credibility” (V), “I wouldn’t discuss the colour of orange juice with you” (The Young Ones), and so on.
Armed with a voucher from the local video rental outlet and a few bucks, I decided to take a punt on G.I. Joe to see who was right: the “haters” or the defenders. Use of the former always sets off alarm bells in my mind that the idiot who is whining this word is trying to apologise for something utterly terrible (check out Tom Cruise’s fans on the IMDB board in his name for a great example of this).
Unfortunately for everyone who starred in this abortion, it IS a complete artistic whitewash. If it were a Batman film, it would be one starring Adam West. If it were an attempt at a RoboCop sequel, it would be RoboCop 3. If it were an X-Men film, it would be X-Men: The Last Stand, or X-Men In Name Only as it is rightly called by the world’s real X-Men.
Web humorist Maddox once wrote a critique of the Daredevil film that, with slight modifications, sums this film up perfectly. Character development is either completely missing or is done so poorly that it is impossible to not imagine the script being written by the six year old version of me. You know a script is in poor shape when a terrorist army’s leader stops the climactic action scene dead in its tracks to explain to the audience where he came from. And the Cobra personnel being all implanted with a mind-controlling chip? Considering what is presently known about the neurological system of our species, such a thing is a hundred years away in the worst case scenario, not the few years the makers claimed in their publicity. I am all for suspension of disbelief, but suspension of disbelief requires that the writer keeps at least a toe in the realm of plausibility. Oddly enough, one technology that is here and now is that necessary to test whether the President really is the President as opposed to a really good impersonator. At least Dave had a halfway convincing story about how the impersonation could fool most people some of the time.
It is probably best not to even comment about the so-called action sequences, except to say that Hollywood needs Paul Verhoeven back now more than ever.
In closing, I think this film is best summarised by what I told my mother after seeing it. I would call it shit, but that would be a slur to the good name of fecal matter.
Leave a Comment